We’ve had miserable weather the past few weeks. I’m not
going to complain because I knew what Kansas City weather was like when I moved
back here from California way back when. Since it was icy and cold I took the
opportunity to go through the books I’d picked up at estate sales last year and
decide which ones I really will read and which ones would go to Half Price
Books. That’s how I came to read America:
Who Stole the Dream, by Donald L. Bartlett and James B. Steele.
These guys must feel like modern-day Cassandras. The book
was published in 1996 (during the Clinton years), and it could be read as a
list of reasons people got fed up enough to elect Donald Trump twenty years
later.
It’s all there and more. America separating into the
have-mores and the have-lesses, companies sending jobs abroad with the
government’s blessing and in some cases assistance (again, this was during the
Clinton Administration), massive abuses of the H-1B visa program (we’ll talk
more about that later), lobbying abuses, the “retraining” scam (the main
beneficiaries of these programs, it turns out, are the contractors, schools,
and people employed to administer the programs, which offer little benefit to
those being retrained for jobs that aren’t there), etc.
I found the discussion of the H-1B visa abuses particularly
interesting. Messrs. Bartlett and Steele give some rather egregious examples
from 1996 including Hillary Clinton’s hairstylist getting one for a stylist
(for $5.25 an hour), Pat Buchanan’s sister got one to hire an au par for $13.54
per hour, Richard Nixon’s former attorney was granted one to hire a
housekeeper, and the list goes on. In each of these cases the visa was granted
because there supposedly were no American workers qualified to do the jobs. No
Americans qualified to style hair? To babysit? To clean house?
Recently, more than twenty years later, H-1B visas have
come under more scrutiny. In February of last year the New York Times reported on H-1B visas’ being used to cut labor
costs in the tech industry. One example given was the University of California,
San Francisco importing foreign nationals and paying them $65,000 a year to do
the jobs of people who, after training their replacements, would lose their
jobs, which had paid $130,000. Obviously, the argument that there were no
Americans qualified to do these jobs falls apart upon examination.
Who can blame people for being upset? Electing Donald Trump
may seem like a drastic measure, but you can see that people who feel like
they’re being shafted might be willing to do something drastic when the status
quo seems lined up against them and unwilling to change. After all, isn’t that
how the American Revolution started? There’s a precedent.
When I read books about what’s wrong with the system I
always want to hear the authors’ solutions. Unfortunately, this is where the
book fails. It suggests steps the government can take. After 200 pages of
documenting how government, as Ronald Reagan used to say, is the problem, the
authors seem to believe the government will have a “road to Damascus”
experience.
I’d suggest we not rely on a suddenly benevolent government
and start taking our fates into our own hands.
In 2005 I wrote Political
Frugality to provide a roadmap for an economic approach to protesting
marriage inequality. We’ve won that one. Let’s use those same tactics to
protest economic inequality.
©
2018 Larry Roth
No comments:
Post a Comment